Sample data noticeThis visualisation intentionally replaces all client-sensitive information from the underlying report with fictional details. It is not evidence of testing at the fictional site.
SLIP RESISTANCE ASSESSMENT
Sample Commercial Facility
Perth, Western Australia · Demonstration report
REPORT IDPS-DEMO-SR-2026-001
Executive summary
The sample assessment demonstrates how Prime Safety can present the scope, testing methods, measured results and classification outcomes in a format designed for property, facilities and WHS decision-making. The fictional data below is illustrative only.
Example finding
Several illustrative wet areas are shown below their nominated minimum classification, while the dry test examples meet the D1 threshold. A real report would tie findings to the actual areas inspected and the agreed scope.
Methodology & conditions
The report structure follows the source report’s distinction between wet pendulum testing and dry floor friction testing for existing pedestrian surfaces.
Wet Pendulum
Measures frictional characteristics under wet conditions using a pendulum-mounted rubber slider. Results are expressed as BPN/SRV and classified using the applicable wet classification guidance.
- Standard
- AS 4663:2013, Appendix A
- Typical slider
- Rubber Slider 96 (4S) for smoother indoor surfaces
- Output
- Mean BPN / wet classification
Dry Floor Friction
Measures the coefficient of friction of an existing surface under dry conditions using a floor friction tester at a controlled speed.
- Standard
- AS 4663:2013 dry floor friction method
- Equipment
- Tortus 3 / comparable floor friction tester
- Output
- Mean CoF / D classification
Important: dry friction results describe dry-condition performance and do not replace wet-condition assessment where wet or contaminated conditions are relevant.
Illustrative results dashboard
These values are fictional. They demonstrate how a report can show the measured result beside the nominated minimum.
WET PENDULUMMixedExample areas below and above nominated minimums
DRY FLOOR FRICTIOND1Illustrative mean CoF values ≥ 0.40
| Area | Condition | Required | Measured | Class | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry A | Wet | P2 | 31 BPN | P2 | Meets |
| Entry B | Wet | P2 | 19 BPN | P1 | Action |
| Public amenities | Wet | P3 | 28 BPN | P2 | Action |
| Covered walkway | Wet | P4 | 57 BPN | P5 | Meets |
| Entry A | Dry | D1 ≥ 0.40 | 0.76 | D1 | Meets |
| Public amenities | Dry | D1 ≥ 0.40 | 0.58 | D1 | Meets |
Classification guides
The underlying report uses AS 4586:2013 classification guidance and SA HB 198:2014 interpretative guidance. The examples below are presented as an awareness aid, not a substitute for a project-specific assessment.
Wet pendulum — Slider 96
P5>54Very low notional contribution to wet slip risk
P445–54Low
P335–44Moderate
P225–34High
P112–24Very high
P0<12Extremely high
Dry floor friction
D1≥0.40Moderate to very low notional contribution when dry
D0<0.40Below D1 threshold
Context matters. Application-specific minimums can vary by location and use. SA HB 198:2014 provides interpretative guidance for areas such as entries, transitional areas, toilets, supermarkets, ramps and external walkways.